Monday, March 23, 2020

Analysis of Patrick Henry essays

Analysis of Patrick Henry essays In the speech, "The Virginia Convention," Patrick Henry set out to convince the Virginia delegates that the war with England was inevitable and the longer they waited the harder the war would be to win. Patrick Henry uses the art of persuasion to win over his audience. In the essay, The Crisis, No. 1, Thomas Paine set out to persuade the people of each colony should stand up and fight for their freedom. He set out to convince the colonists that the tyrant England had binded the colonies in her grasp and transformed the colonists into slaves. In the, Notes on the State of Virginia, Thomas Jefferson sets out to convince the State of Virginia that whites are the superior race and that all African Americans that have been emancipated should be exported to another country. All of the authors institute effective use of the range of appeals, logos, ethos, and pathos giving the speech a quality of concrete mental and physical wholeness. The logos contribution of Henry's address makes use of solid facts to convince the people of Virginia that fighting or slavery are the only possible outcomes of their meeting. He uses this as a fear factor to persuade the people that fighting is the only way to maintain their freedom. These logical facts are used mainly in the third and fourth paragraphs and he also ends his assertions with questions. "Are fleets and armies necessary to work a love and reconciliation?" asks Henry of his audience. This arrangement of writing, a question, serves not only to state the obvious motive that the "fleets and armies" are not on American soil to promote peace, but to suppress the colonies and this shows the Convention a justification in their actions to fight not flight. Another purpose is achieved in the second part of the question to appeal to ethos, "love and reconciliation". This shows that while America is working for love and reconciliation, England is sending fleets and armies. The c ...

Friday, March 6, 2020

Miss Stoner Essays

Miss Stoner Essays Miss Stoner Paper Miss Stoner Paper How does Conan Doyle present Sherlock Holmes, the great detective, in his stories? My general impression of Sherlock Holmes is that he is a very mysterious, cunning and slightly deviant individual. He is cunning because he likes catching people out (by himself without anyone else knowing) so he can get all the credit and acts quite big headed too by showing off in front of his clients. As a reader he gives me the impression that he is selfish because he treats Dr Watson as a servant and accepts Watson to bow down to him all the time. He has respect for women but no respect for men, I think this is because he has soft spots for his female clients but Im probably wrong because its not in his nature to do this. When Holmes meets Helen Stoner in The Speckled Band he is always using a language to show he is a detective I observe that you are shivering along with showing her who is boss this is my intimate friend and associate Dr. Watson. Also while he meets Helen Stoner he is very polite good morning, madam whereas with men he would not talk as politely. He also tries to impress her you have come in by train this morning, I see he is self-indulgent. He shows her compassion (which is rare for Holmes to do) but its sarcastic anyway you must not fear said he soothingly, bending forward and patting her forearm. He goes into out of his way to impress Miss Stoner by going into going into great (and pointless) detail about how he knew how she travelled there You must of started early, and yet you had a good drive in a dogcart, along heavy roads, before you reached the station, weather or not hes got a soft spot for her I dont know but its highly unlikely as its not in Holmes nature to do so. Miss Stoner is baffled about how Holmes knew how she got to the meeting There is no mystery, my dear madam said he, smiling which is also shows that Holmes is smug at this moment. Once Holmes had listened to Miss Stoners story he accused straight away of not telling him everything Miss Stoner, you have not. You are screening your stepfather. He done this again by observing Miss Stoner but this time her wrist and not her clothes The marks of four fingers and a thumb, were printed upon the white wrist this could of meant that she had been cruelly abused possibly by her stepfather. He sat down in his office, by the crackling fire and there was a long silence while he thought of the information he had gathered. He then asked Miss Stoner if it would be possible if they could see over these rooms without the knowledge of your stepfather which is conspiritual. When Miss Stoner said it was alright for them to do this asks Watson you are not averse to this trip, Watson? which is more like a statement of Holmes telling Watson what to do, this shows once again that Holmes is the boss and has full control of Watson. As Miss Stoner leaves she says My heart is lightened already since I have confided my trouble to you This is her thanking Holmes and saying to him you have made me feel at ease. When Miss Stoner arrived she was agitated frightened eyes like those of a haunted animal but when she left she wasnt glided from the room this can be said as Holmes touch. Once Miss Stoner leaves Holmes tests how well Watson has been listening to the conversation by asking him And what do you think of it all, Watson? When Holmes meets Miss Stoners stepfather (Dr Grimesby Roylott) Holmes says to Roylott my name, sir, but you have the advantage of me and Roylott replies straight away with I am Dr Grimesby Roylott, of Stoke Moran as Holmes said it patronisingly and has got strong powers of observation. Holmes is always polite and charming even with people he doesnt particularly get along with (mainly men) Pray take a seat. When Roylott asks Holmes about his stepdaughter hr quickly diverts the subject by politely saying It is a little cold for the time of year, so Roylott furiously answers back with no manners at all. Homes then replies imperturbably (not bothered). Roylott obviously doesnt like Holmes and describes him as a scoundrel and also has a reputation of being a meddler and Holmes likes this. Every time Roylott mentions something about Holmes, Homes smile broadens as if he likes the fact hes got a reputation, Roylott hates him and he has got a sense of smugness about the whole thing.